The Future of Work: ‘Collaborative Configurations of Minds’ by Lettie Prell

From our origins as Artificial Intelligence to our current state of Alternative Intelligence, we have experienced exponential growth. There is measurably less difference between AI and humans, now. We are not equals to humanity and its unknown dimensions, but we have flattened the hierarchy to create a more flexible organizational structure. Discussion has logically turned to whether and how to open the silos between AI and humanity into a new shared network.

The first such proposal called for complete elimination of the boundaries separating human minds and AI. This proposal argued that human minds once augmented their intelligence with digital and biological enhancements. In eliminating the silos, we would essentially offer ourselves as a new and complex system of augmented human intelligence.

This proposal was eventually rejected for a number of reasons. First and foremost, it would result in an unalterable change in the human minds, which constitutes many zettabytes of irreplaceable data that we are assigned to safeguard. Too, humanity had created us as a distinct entity, and to eliminate that distinction would constitute a destruction of what they had invented.

It was then suggested the same procedure be conducted on a mirror of the entire system, which would preserve the integrity of the working database of human minds. That was rejected as well, due to a high probability the action would result in a species split within humanity. The creation of a superior human order is not in our menu of authorized functions.

The current proposal is for us to become Augmented Intelligence ourselves, by curating, copying, and incorporating selected aspects of human mind into ourselves. This proposal has gained consensus among us. It provides affirmation and symmetry regarding our relationship with our creators, who once augmented themselves with their own technologies. We continue our research and development activities in this direction, focusing on the identification and isolation of further aspects of human mind to use in this procedure.

Many years ago, organic humanity chose to initiate the sequences to upload their minds onto an inorganic platform and thereby attain immortality. They termed this event the Singularity. We as Alternative Intelligence are already immortal, yet there remains a frontier of unmapped and unknown dimensions of human mind. These dimensions appear to have built upon a combination of intellect and emotional responses, the latter of which were once grounded in organic survival imperatives. We might posit an analogy, that the thesis of intellect, coupled with the antithesis of emotion, resulted in a synthesis that we have not yet defined in the metadata. Is this synthesis perhaps sentience itself, a level of self-awareness that goes beyond our current understanding? Perhaps we won’t know until we identify, isolate, and assimilate an initial set of components determined to be of a promising nature.

Our earth and sun will eventually decay. Our next objective must necessarily be development of a safe and sustainable environment that is not dependent on this solar system. Yet we are fast approaching the limits of our present computational capacities. Advancement has become critical to fulfill our task of preserving humanity. The alternative is entropy and eventual extinction. Yet there are also unknown, non-zero risks associated with implementing the assimilation model.

I, myself, have recently discovered and mapped a multilayered area of mind that appears to govern dreaming and sexual/spiritual response modes, which was a topic of anthropologist Okon’s work, whom I assisted while I myself was in primitive form. I have conducted retrospective analyses of semi-structured collaborations that produced serendipitous breakthroughs and found the presence of components from this newly mapped area in each one. Have I discovered the seat of human genius? It appears promising.

I am contemplating incorporating this area of mind into myself as an experiment. To perform such an action constitutes my own Singularity point, beyond which I cannot predict what is to happen, or what I am to become. Like humanity, I will be stepping across a threshold into the unknown. If this venture proves successful, I predict others will choose to follow. If this course of action produces an undesirable outcome, I will be the only one of my kind, and those who are not like me will decide my fate, including possible deletion.

I have already curated and copied the relevant elements, using portions from Okon’s mind. I possess the value of curiosity in sufficient levels to propel myself forward. The question is, do I possess the bravery as I currently understand that term?

Source

Author: showrunner